🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.